Philosophical question for IPv6 Day
dougb at dougbarton.us
Thu Jun 9 23:56:37 CEST 2011
On 06/08/2011 17:21, Bill Owens wrote:
> Which is better, at this stage of IPv6 deployment and transition:
> - a fully dual-stacked website, functional for a v6-only client without resorting to v4, and located at a separate URL (www.ipv6, etc.)
> - a v6-accessible skeleton at the main URL (www) that isn't functional by itself, and forces the client to use v4 to fetch a substantial amount of the content.
> (I vote for the first choice, since I don't think the second one really proves anything - it doesn't drive backbone traffic, doesn't reveal path problems, etc.)
With due respect to those who have answered already, I find it
impossible to answer this question without knowing your goals.
In the generic sense, I agree with Gert's answer. Just do it.
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
More information about the ipv6-ops