Philosophical question for IPv6 Day
gert at space.net
Thu Jun 9 07:19:36 CEST 2011
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 10:16:25PM -0400, Bill Owens wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 05:24:25PM -0700, Erik Kline wrote:
> > The second one. It might seem cheesey, but it can be steadily
> > refactored and improved for more IPv6 piece by piece and gains real
> > IPv6 users. Nobody uses alternate domainnames.
> But has that actually happened anywhere? It seems as though we've
> had the example of alternate websites that eventually entered into
> production, but I don't know of anyone who's done what you propose.
www.heise.de is an example for that. The main web site is fully v6-capable,
but parts of the ads come from v4-only servers (because the ad hosters'
answer to v6 still seems to be "v-what?").
did you enable IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
More information about the ipv6-ops