RA & DHCP problem...

[Mikael Abrahamsson]

On Mon, 30 Dec 2013, Roger Jørgensen wrote:

> What is wrong with having a _choice_ if you want to ha RAs+OTHER just 
> OTHER? Right now it's DHCPv6 that are OTHER, but someone mention dibbler 
> here in another mail?

Perhaps because a lot of thinking went into the the current way things are 
done? It's probably documented in the RFCs from the 90ties. Now you're 
coming and saying that thinking in invalid. I believe you have the burden 
of proof here.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at swm.pp.se