1::1/128 + 2::2/128 - GRH Anomalies Delta (2012-08-17)

[William F. Maton Sotomayor]

On Fri, 17 Aug 2012, Jared Mauch wrote:

>
> On Aug 17, 2012, at 7:13 AM, Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org> wrote:
>
>> Regarding the prefix leaks: le sigh.  Don't people ever learn not to accept
>> arbitrary crap from customers?  Prefix leaks require stupidity on two
>> parts, not just one.
>
> Sadly just one.  It's not like the default Cisco policy is to block routes.
>
> The path to a route leak is:
>
> router bgp X
> neighbor 2002::1:2:3:4 remote-as 5678
>
> TCP can come up before the next line is typed/pasted, even if they did configure a policy.

If only the implementation were changed to force the user to invoke the 
'activate' command there might be some hope that we can all be saved.

Yeah, yeah, I know.

wfms