1::1/128 + 2::2/128 - GRH Anomalies Delta (2012-08-17)

[Jared Mauch]

On Aug 17, 2012, at 7:13 AM, Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org> wrote:

> Regarding the prefix leaks: le sigh.  Don't people ever learn not to accept
> arbitrary crap from customers?  Prefix leaks require stupidity on two
> parts, not just one.

Sadly just one.  It's not like the default Cisco policy is to block routes.

The path to a route leak is:

router bgp X
 neighbor 2002::1:2:3:4 remote-as 5678

TCP can come up before the next line is typed/pasted, even if they did configure a policy.

- Jared
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20120817/2b0bf102/attachment.htm>