Google and IPv6

[Jeroen Massar]

Remi Denis-Courmont wrote:
[..]
> Because of these issues, I have been suggesting that RFC3484 be modified to
> favor IPv4, including private, addresses over Teredo, and even over 6to4.
> But it seems most people disagree, or don't care.

I can agree with that.

It should be (IMHO :) :
  - native unicast IPv6
  - native IPv4
  - VPN's
	- proto-41 static
	- 6to4
	- Teredo
	- AYIYA
	- ...

MTU-based decision could work of course, as the top one has an MTU of 
1500, the rest will sink down to 1280 in most cases.

The above still needs to have a 'site-local' section of course.

Greets,
  Jeroen


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20080317/a2255ffa/attachment.sig>