IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header issues

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 02:09:32PM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> >and the BSDs need to do a bit of homework (should never forward packets if
> >ip6.forwarding is 0, and it's surprising that pf(4) can't filter on RH0s).
> 
> that is not a problem of the BSDs. That's a problem of the RFC, which
> is speaking of 'node' and not 'router' in first place.

So why does that make the BSDs unable to pf(4) these packets...?

(Well... I agree that the wording could be a bit more clear, but seems
that everybody *else* did it interpret differently...?)

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  113403

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20070424/3ed92331/attachment.sig>