dead horse: ip6.int vs ip6.arpa

Iljitsch van Beijnum iljitsch at muada.com
Tue Jul 5 12:42:21 CEST 2005


On 5-jul-2005, at 4:54, bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote:

>>     Are we still slothing towards ip6.arpa, or is ip6.int it right
>> now, or both?

>     ip6.arpa is the wave of the future.
>     ip6.int is still needed for any resolver deployed
>     btwn 1996-2004.

I want my bitlabels back.



More information about the ipv6-ops mailing list