dead horse: ip6.int vs ip6.arpa

[bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com]

On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 05:25:41PM -0400, William F. Maton Sotomayor wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> 	So I came across this draft whilst debuggging an IPv6 DNS problem:
> 
> http://unfix.org/~jeroen/archive/drafts/draft-massar-v6ops-ip6int-removal-00.html
> 
> 	Are we still slothing towards ip6.arpa, or is ip6.int it right 
> now, or both?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> wfms

	ip6.arpa is the wave of the future.
	ip6.int is still needed for any resolver deployed
	btwn 1996-2004.  

--bill