Why do we still need IPv4 when we are migrating to IPv6...

Darren Pilgrim list_ipv6-ops at bluerosetech.com
Thu Feb 12 12:00:07 CET 2015

On 2015-02-12 01:41, Ole Troan wrote:
> But that's "better value" by making IPv4 work less good. and I'll
> postulate that we can make A+P / shared IPv4 work good enough that
> end-users who are trained to live behind a NATs will not notice.

Home end-users trained to live behind NATs are users trained to live 
behind a NAT that supports UPnP and port-forwarding.

More information about the ipv6-ops mailing list