'Upgrading' NAT64 to 464XLAT?

[Dick Visser]

Well, to be honest that wasn't even clear to me ;-)
I just am reading up on the RFC and it looks like it doesn't have to
be on the end host necessarily:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6877#section-6.5

Time for me to read the rfcs in their entirety




On 25 November 2013 15:22, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke at cisco.com> wrote:
> Dick
>
> 464XLAT is contained within a host, so, you will need an implementation for all your end host (laptop, tablets, ...)
>
> But, I am sure that you already know that ;-)
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ipv6-ops-bounces+evyncke=cisco.com at lists.cluenet.de
>> [mailto:ipv6-ops-bounces+evyncke=cisco.com at lists.cluenet.de] On
>> Behalf Of Dick Visser
>> Sent: lundi 25 novembre 2013 14:20
>> To: ipv6-ops at lists.cluenet.de
>> Subject: 'Upgrading' NAT64 to 464XLAT?
>>
>> hi guys
>>
>> We've been running a NAT64/DNS64 set-up for a while now on some parts
>> of
>> our office network.
>> This seems to work well, but it doens't work for everything (e.g.
>> Skype
>> etc).
>> If those apps were working, it would be possible to actually use if
>> for
>> production.
>> I was reading about 464XLAT, and from what I understand, this is more
>> or
>> less NAT64, but with some sort of local (RFC1918) IPv4 in the mix.
>>
>> For phones this is done using a special daemon that provides a local
>> IPv4 address.
>> I'd like to 'upgrade' out existing NAT64/DNS64 setup to do 464XLAT,
>> but
>> there aren't many docs about how to set 464XLAT to begin with.
>> I've seen https://sites.google.com/site/tmoipv6/464xlat, and I asked
>> around here and there.
>> A schema with actual addresses would be nice, but I can't find that.
>>
>> Since we have an office set-up with, I assume I should configure the
>> IPv6-only VLAN so that RFC1918 addresses are handed out on it as
>> well?
>>
>> What I don't understand, if a device gets an RFC1918 IPv4 address,
>> and a
>> global IPv6 address, how would it be possible that apps that support
>> IPv6-only use the IPv6 path? I can imagine that some applications
>> still
>> prefer to take the IPv4 path?
>>
>>
>> Thanks!!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dick Visser
>> System & Networking Engineer
>> TERENA Secretariat
>> Singel 468 D, 1017 AW Amsterdam
>> The Netherlands
>



-- 
Dick Visser
System & Networking Engineer
TERENA Secretariat
Singel 468 D, 1017 AW Amsterdam
The Netherlands