6to4 status (again)

Brzozowski, John Jason jjmb at jjmb.com
Thu Feb 28 13:20:53 CET 2013

In a couple of weeks I will have some statistics for you here as to what %
of 6to4 use appears to be from behind a home router that is 6to4 enabled.
 It is greater than zero.

On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Keith Moore <moore at network-heretics.com>wrote:

> Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 27, 2013, at 7:30 PM, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo at google.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 5:30 AM, Christopher Palmer <
> Christopher.Palmer at microsoft.com> wrote:
>>  2.       **The majority of home users don’t have routers that support
>> UPnP management of NAT/FW openings, at least from our telemetry.
> Amen.
> In the routers I've seen, it is off by default.  But I'm not sure what
> this has to do with 6to4, since last I knew UPnP didn't support opening
> arbitrary IP protocol types.  Or did it get extended?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20130228/f2e4d862/attachment.html 

More information about the ipv6-ops mailing list