multiple prefixes

Doug Barton dougb at
Tue Feb 12 19:19:22 CET 2013

On 02/12/2013 03:31 AM, Tore Anderson wrote:
> * Doug Barton
>> >On 02/12/2013 12:17 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>>> >>See page 6 of RFC 6296.
>> >
>> >That has nothing to do with NPTv6

Why is it that you think taking my quote completely out of context is an 
effective way to make your argument?

Go back and read what I wrote ... the bit that has nothing to do with 
NPTv6 is using FTP without passive mode. Using NPTv6 instead of NAT 
would actually _allow_ you to do that, providing the firewall 
administrator leaves ftp-data open, which they almost certainly will not 

And yes, I have read 6296, several times, before and after it became an 


More information about the ipv6-ops mailing list