IPV6 Minimom alocation for recidential customers
jeroen at massar.ch
Tue Aug 20 16:46:38 CEST 2013
On 2013-08-20 16:40 , Arturo Servin wrote:
> So it seems that we agree.
No, we do not agree as your statement is wrong.
I suggest you read up on:
and as you claim to work for LACNIC:
> On 8/20/13 11:36 AM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
>>>> It may be some bias from some organizations or individuals in those
>>>> regions, but at the end the decision of using /64, /60, /56 or /48
>>>> depends on the ISP alone.
>> As prefixes are allocated based on the amount of address space one
>> needs, the ISP receives that allocation from RIR based on the intended
>> usage. As such, it is also expected that the space is actually used for
>> those purposes.
>> Next to that there is a very nice IETF recommendation too...
>> If ISPs are just going to give a single /64 to end-sites, then they
>> could just as well just stick with IPv4.
More information about the ipv6-ops