IPv6 Firewall on CPEs - Default on or off

Philipp Kern phil at philkern.de
Mon Nov 26 13:18:57 CET 2012

On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:04:23AM +0000, Benedikt Stockebrand wrote:
> And to make things really ugly this even has a legal dimension to it:
> If any of your customers is getting attacked via IPv6 then you might
> actually be held liable for the damages---because you didn't take care
> of the risks of that new technology that "you forced upon them".

Yay, associating IPv6 deployment with legal risks. And people might
point them to the mail and assume willfulness. Great job.

Kind regards
Philipp Kern
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20121126/a8362018/attachment.bin 

More information about the ipv6-ops mailing list