Tayga as NAT64 only, not router

Andy Davidson andy at nosignal.org
Sun Mar 18 23:15:42 CET 2012

On 16 Mar 2012, at 18:51, Dick Visser wrote:

> I guess adding a MASQUERADE step using a large enough RFC1918 block is the only way out here?

Or using a stateful NAT64 (*vomit in mouth*) gateway ?  Have you considered this ?  Is the software availability good ?

I ask because, well, if each v6 client will consume a v4 address on the 64 gateway, this does not help us sidestep the v4 exhaustion issue very cleanly. :-)


More information about the ipv6-ops mailing list