Tayga as NAT64 only, not router
andy at nosignal.org
Sun Mar 18 23:15:42 CET 2012
On 16 Mar 2012, at 18:51, Dick Visser wrote:
> I guess adding a MASQUERADE step using a large enough RFC1918 block is the only way out here?
Or using a stateful NAT64 (*vomit in mouth*) gateway ? Have you considered this ? Is the software availability good ?
I ask because, well, if each v6 client will consume a v4 address on the 64 gateway, this does not help us sidestep the v4 exhaustion issue very cleanly. :-)
More information about the ipv6-ops