happy CGN -- beating happy eyeballs and trending toward E2E success
Daniel Roesen
dr at cluenet.de
Wed Jun 13 00:50:07 CEST 2012
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 05:21:05PM -0400, Erik Nygren wrote:
> A "good" Happy Eyeballs implementation should compare IPv4 vs IPv6
> TCP (HTTP) performance and availability with some preference towards
> IPv6 (whether it is 30ms or 300ms).
Unfortunately, Apple thinks different:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/current/msg10080.html
Best regards,
Daniel
--
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
More information about the ipv6-ops
mailing list