1::1/128 + 2::2/128 - GRH Anomalies Delta (2012-08-17)
jeroen at unfix.org
Fri Aug 17 13:59:46 CEST 2012
On 2012-08-17 13:28, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) wrote:
>> While that is true, 1::1 and 2::2 should never exist anywhere, they
>> are outside of 2000::/3 and thus are not defined and thus should
>> not be used and definitely never ever be routed on the Internet.
>> Same for that silly 64:ff9b::/96 prefix.
> Jeroen, I am sure that you know that 64:ff9b::/96 is the 'official'
> prefix for NAT64 RFC 6052.
No, I did not... and now I do, thanks.
It is oddly enough not registered in:
> It does not really change your conclusion
> anyway since this prefix should be kept within an AS
The NAT64 prefix from just a few moments ago will pop up as such now in GRH.
(off to find time to once and for all optimize GRH so that it is speedy
More information about the ipv6-ops