1::1/128 + 2::2/128 - GRH Anomalies Delta (2012-08-17)

Eric Vyncke (evyncke) evyncke at cisco.com
Fri Aug 17 13:28:13 CEST 2012

> While that is true, 1::1 and 2::2 should never exist anywhere, they are
> outside of 2000::/3 and thus are not defined and thus should not be used
> and definitely never ever be routed on the Internet. Same for that silly
> 64:ff9b::/96 prefix.

I am sure that you know that 64:ff9b::/96 is the 'official' prefix for NAT64 RFC 6052. It does not really change your conclusion anyway since this prefix should be kept within an AS


More information about the ipv6-ops mailing list