Open Letters to Sixxs

[Meftah Tayeb]

Pim Van,
i am just looking for a alternative way.
i don't need this stupid SixXs at all anymore.
also, Pim, are you Pim for Multicast? no IGMP? :D
:)
Thank you

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Pim van Pelt" <pim at ipng.nl>
To: "Meftah Tayeb" <tayeb.meftah at gmail.com>
Cc: <ipv6-ops at lists.cluenet.de>; <nanog at nanog.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 5:28 PM
Subject: Re: Open Letters to Sixxs


> Hoi,
>
> Meftah perhaps you mailed the wrong people -- you seem to be
> specifically addressing SixXS, but you mailed nanog at nanog.org and
> ipv6-ops at lists.cluenet.de, both of which may not be able to
> authoritatively answer your questions.
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Meftah Tayeb <tayeb.meftah at gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>> why SIXXS is very strict like that ?
> I suppose it's up to SixXS to define their policy (one account per
> person comes to mind *) and revise it if they see a need. They are
> free to accept or reject any user and I do not believe they have an
> obligation to serve any given user (ie access is a privilege not a
> right), and I think they have a right to ask for information just as
> much as users have a right to not use their service if they believe
> the amount of information SixXS wants to know about them and their
> intended use is too much. In general I think they are rather
> transparent about rejection reasons, in your case likely because you
> neglected to heed the FAQ item on one account per person.
>
> I'm not sure bringing this up in the scope of nanog or ipv6-ops is
> productive. It's not clear to me, except for your plethora of
> questions, what you are trying to accomplish.
>
> I'm sorry you feel that SixXS is not the right place for you. Luckily
> there's plenty of choice in high quality tunnelbrokers, as others in
> this thread have pointed out.
>
> groet,
> Pim
>
> *) http://www.sixxs.net/faq/account/?faq=oneaccount
> -- 
> Pim van Pelt <pim at ipng.nl>
> PBVP1-RIPE - http://www.ipng.nl/
>
>
> __________ Information provenant d'ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version de la 
> base des signatures de virus 6465 (20110915) __________
>
> Le message a été vérifié par ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
> 


__________ Information provenant d'ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version de la base des signatures de virus 6465 (20110915) __________

Le message a été vérifié par ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com