An RFC is an RFC when it is an RFC (Was: Question Re: best practices)

[Ted Mittelstaedt]

On 5/9/2011 3:53 PM, Simon Perreault wrote:
> On 2011-05-09 17:21, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>>> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca/
>>
>> Because those are proprietary we really have no way, short of signing an
>> NDA, of knowing if they really are independent.
>
> Ecdysis is not proprietary, it is open source. We have two independent
> NAT64 implementations: one for Linux and one for BSD. And we have two
> independent DNS64 implementations: one for Bind and one for Unbound.
>


And you know that those companies are NOT using your patches in their 
products?  The BSD licensed ones?

When are you going to update your website with the current RFCs?

OpenBSD is at 4.9 as well.  Do the patches still apply to the 4.9
kernel?

Ted

> Simon