World IPv6 Day?

[Martin Millnert]

On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 11:48 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 01/12/2011 11:41, Martin Millnert wrote:
> > I'd rather the previously mentioned list of big players (and whoever
> > else decides to join in) do a serious job in enabling IPv6 on their
> > services, so that, hopefully, when the trial is over, they can just let
> > it stay on, just as vg.no did.
> 
> It's unlikely that it will happen that way, for a variety of complex 
> reasons. The whole "Just Do It" idea does not work when you're talking 
> multi-billion dollar corporations where 1/2000 customers not being able 
> to reach their site == millions of dollars of lost revenue.

That brokeness of 0.2% that you just pulled out of nowhere, is hopefully
a number that will be thoroughly investigated during the trial window.
  Obviously there is a number of brokeness that even Google *will*
accept.  Only the event itself can provide the real world wide number,
since no event of similar scale has been tested.

I hope for open communication of what the measured brokeness is, and
good analysis of why (redpill/vg.no comes to mind as a lower limit).

Cheers,
-- 
Martin Millnert <martin at millnert.se>