ipv6 next-hop link-local

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 11:02:35PM +1030, Mark Smith wrote:
> Just that if Gert feels he needs to question people in his email
> signature, by default, as to whether they've enabled IPv6 or not, it
> seems to me that is a sign that there isn't very much IPv6 operational
> experience yet. 

There's a fair bit of operational experience on the routing side of things
(the IXPs we're connected to have offered IPv6 roughly since 2001).

My signature is more targeting the serious lack of IPv6 deployment in
"hosts", that is, communication endpoints.  Lots of people need to do 
their part there, so a gentle reminder every now and then might keep 
the issue in mind...

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
did you enable IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 306 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20110219/e8645683/attachment.sig>