a rediculous IPv6 deployment that dind't actutally deploy IPv6

Bernd Walter ticso at cicely7.cicely.de
Thu Feb 17 20:48:00 CET 2011

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 06:06:50PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:07:18AM -0600, Jack Bates wrote:
> > On 2/16/2011 7:38 PM, Mark Yarbrough wrote:
> > > NOC Guy:  No, we just need to move some around and you are asking for a lot.
> > 
> > LOL, is it really that hard to add some IP addressing to the pool? If 
> > they are THAT low, they should have requested some more. Last I checked, 
> > the RIR isn't out yet.
> That usually requires producing documentation about the addresses they
> already have...

And once a RIR gets aware that you don't document correctly they reduce
your allocation window to zero, so you even have to ask the RIR about
every IP range you hand out from your already existing pool.

B.Walter <bernd at bwct.de> http://www.bwct.de
Modbus/TCP Ethernet I/O Baugruppen, ARM basierte FreeBSD Rechner uvm.

More information about the ipv6-ops mailing list