[jump-admins] IPv6 multihoming

Daniel Roesen dr at cluenet.de
Tue Feb 8 20:31:58 CET 2011

On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 03:34:55PM +0000, James A. T. Rice wrote:
> Typically this "need" is consistent with having an additional network, 
> autonomous (possibly not connected to) from the first, which they need to 
> announce some IP space from, generally they will then also have a seperate 
> autonomous system number for the additional site.

I don't think so. My impression is that most "legit" "needs" are because of
inbound traffic engineering.

[as always, "legit" and "need" is in the eye of the beholder]

> "Who asks for an additional block gets one, provided that they also meet 
> the requirements for additional autonomous system number under which they 
> will announce this additional prefix."

Doesn't really solve the traffic engineering problem.

Best regards,

CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0

More information about the ipv6-ops mailing list