IPv6 teredo blackout June 8th

[Daniel Roesen]

On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 11:10:30AM +1300, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> On 2011-02-04 04:28, Daniel Roesen wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 10:13:29AM +0100, Phil wrote:
> >> 6to4 static tunnels
> > 
> > I guess you mean 6over4?
> 
> Indeed there is no such thing as a "6to4 static tunnel",
> but "6over4" is RFC 2529, which is definitely not what
> he means.

Argh, indeed. I actually meant "6in4" as a well-known residential CPE
router vendor in Germany calls it in the GUI. :-)

So yes, stateless statically configured slap-v4-headers-on-v6-packets
tunnels.

>    Brian (who takes the blame for both 6over4 and 6to4, but
>           *not* for anycast 6to4, which is the broken one ;-)

OK, we'll assign the blame to generic IETF then. :-)

Time to submit my 4across6 draft. :-P [1]

Best regards,
in rememberance of
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-palet-v6ops-6in4-vs-6over4-01,
Daniel (running for cover)

[1] ah no, that was called "DS-Lite"...

-- 
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0