yum IPv6 repos
mtinka at globaltransit.net
Tue Dec 27 11:18:17 CET 2011
On Tuesday, December 27, 2011 10:10:41 AM Cameron Byrne
> Agreed, that IPv4-only will be around for a long long
> time, hence the need to understand NAT64/DNS64.
Some folks will continue to push NAT44, others NAT444, and
some of us will push NAT64. It's all choice, trade-offs,
While there is bound to be a lot more breakage in NAT64
today due to lack of IPv6 support in common applications
such as Skype, Yahoo Messenger, e.t.c., I believe these can
be fixed by software vendors adding IPv6 support into their
Hopefully, it will get to a stage where NAT64 isn't anymore
broken than NAT44 or NAT444 when it comes to translation.
For us, NAT64 makes sense because we don't have to
transition customers in the future when traffic ratios are
in favour of IPv6 (whenever that is).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20111227/a5c0bfcf/attachment-0001.bin
More information about the ipv6-ops