yum IPv6 repos

Cameron Byrne cb.list6 at gmail.com
Tue Dec 27 03:10:41 CET 2011

On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Doug Barton <dougb at dougbarton.us> wrote:
> On 12/26/2011 17:43, Cameron Byrne wrote:
>> The fact is,
> Facts? You mean your speculation. Calling your speculation a fact
> doesn't make it any more so.

Fair enough.

>> IPv4 is effectively exhausted from the perspective of
>> planning any large scale strategic initiative.
> The carriers that are pushing CGN disagree with you. Not to mention that
> "typical" NAT setups today at the end-user network level only require 1
> IPv4 address. We're going to see IPv4 continue to exist for a very long
> time.

Agreed, that  IPv4-only will be around for a long long time, hence the
need to understand NAT64/DNS64.

> That's not to say that IPv6 isn't a better choice, only that we need to
> be realistic about the landscape.
> --
>                [^L]
>        Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
>        Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/

More information about the ipv6-ops mailing list