I-D Action:draft-azinger-scalable-addressing-00.txt

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:47:10AM +0200, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Sep 2010, Gert Doering wrote:
> 
> > What we have now is by no means the perfect solution, but it's a good 
> > compromise: it's balancing the extreme positions ("no PI at all" and "PI 
> > for everybody, I don't care for the routing table") into something that 
> > makes both sides unhappy, but both sides can (obviously) live with it, 
> > otherwise the policy would not have reached consensus.
> 
> I would like a DFZ slot to cost at least USD1000 per year. I don't care 
> who get's the money, I just want the money to be paid so people don't do 
> it without good reason.

Yes, this is an idea I've also toyed with - and it would nicely self-
regulate those that think they need to deaggregate their /16 into /24s
today, etc.

OTOH, I can already hear Sascha Luck screaming "evil cartel!!!"...

> Unfortunately there is no payment model that makes any sense apart from 
> the ones currently paid to the RIR/LIR for holding the "resource" and I 
> think that's also a fair compromise.

And indeed, payment & policing is going to make this fail - we already
have arguments surrounding routing certificates due to people not wanting
to give "anybody" control over their routing...

Gert Doering
-- 
did you enable IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 306 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20100929/8f9743bf/attachment.sig>