6VPE Route Reflector
Martin Horneffer
maho at nic.dtag.de
Fri Sep 24 16:12:15 CEST 2010
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 10:22:17AM -0700, Cameron Byrne wrote:
[..]
> This is not a huge setback, but it was an unexpected step. Does
> anyone know a way around this requirement on a route reflector? I
> assume adding "ipv6 unicast-routing" enables some code pieces that are
> required for the route reflector to choose routes and handle the ipv6
> data structures, but my concern is that it also turns on other IPv6
> bits that i don't want to have on my route reflector at this point.
My situation is a bit different, but the software was close to your
version and I experienced the same.
But anyways - what kind is your concern of?
As for security: I would suppose that as long as you don't configure
IPv6 on any interface still no IPv6 communication between the outside
and your router should be possible.
As for activating new code paths: I guess this happens anyways if you
activate RR functionality for a new address-family.
Best regards, Martin
>
> Cameron
--
Dr. Martin Horneffer
Deutsche Telekom Netzproduktion GmbH
Technical Engineering Center
Deutsche Telekom Netzproduktion GmbH
Supervisory Board: Dr. Steffen Roehn (Chairman)
Managing Board: Dr. Bruno Jacobfeuerborn (Chairman), Albert Matheis, Klaus Peren
Commercial register: Amtsgericht Bonn HRB 14190
Registered office: Bonn
VAT ident. no.: DE 814645262
More information about the ipv6-ops
mailing list