Addressing Plans -- Bottom-up?

Bertrand Yvain pnl at ielo.net
Fri Sep 10 11:14:17 CEST 2010


Hi,

On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 11:26:43PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> It really depends on the structure of your network.  If you have many
> POPs and don't know how much address space each individual POP is going
> to need, and POPs keep getting added all the time, you want something 
> like the "binary chop" algorithm, helping per-POP aggregation.

This "binary chop" algorithm, or sparse allocation, is (notably)
described here: http://www.ripe.net/docs/ipv6-sparse.html

-- 
Bertrand Yvain
http://www.IELO.net/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20100910/48646d0e/attachment.sig>


More information about the ipv6-ops mailing list