Addressing Plans -- Bottom-up?
Bertrand Yvain
pnl at ielo.net
Fri Sep 10 11:14:17 CEST 2010
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 11:26:43PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> It really depends on the structure of your network. If you have many
> POPs and don't know how much address space each individual POP is going
> to need, and POPs keep getting added all the time, you want something
> like the "binary chop" algorithm, helping per-POP aggregation.
This "binary chop" algorithm, or sparse allocation, is (notably)
described here: http://www.ripe.net/docs/ipv6-sparse.html
--
Bertrand Yvain
http://www.IELO.net/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20100910/48646d0e/attachment.sig>
More information about the ipv6-ops
mailing list