On killing IPv6 transition mechanisms
ivan at main.uusia.org
Sun Mar 14 19:22:58 CET 2010
>>>>> Bjørn Mork <bjorn at mork.no> writes:
>>>>> Ivan Shmakov <ivan at main.uusia.org> writes:
>> I know the difference. The problem is that HE.net offers just a few
>> /64, and I need somewhat larger address space. And they don't seem
>> to offer reverse DNS, which is available for 6to4.
> This is not correct. HE offer both routed /64s and /48s with
> delegated reverse DNS.
Nice to see they do it now; it wasn't the case when I began to
explore IPv6 half a year ago.
Okay, seemingly, that means that I need no 6to4 now. (What I
need is some assistance in migrating a dozen of hosts or so, as
well as a few DNS domains, to the new addresses.)
> They do not offer reverse DNS delegation for the tunnel prefixes.
> Neither do SIXXS. And that makes sense, IMHO.
FSF associate member #7257
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20100315/7361c0c6/attachment.bin
More information about the ipv6-ops