On killing IPv6 transition mechanisms

[Ivan Shmakov]

>>>>> Ole Troan <otroan at employees.org> writes:

 >> I wonder, how no connectivity could be better than some?

 > because content providers measure the difference between IPv4 and
 > IPv6 behaviour for dual stack hosts. if the number of hosts with
 > broken IPv6 connectivity or with significantly worse latency than
 > IPv4, they will not enable IPv6.

 > to put it bluntly: if you don't get IPv6 from your SP, then don't
 > bother. you are doing more harm to IPv6 deployment than good.

	Would I bother not, who will?

-- 
FSF associate member #7257
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20100314/0b0abe67/attachment.sig>