IPv6 cookbook - was RA vs. DHCPv6 discussion

William F. Maton Sotomayor wmaton at ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca
Tue Jun 1 17:58:32 CEST 2010


On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Sam Wilson wrote:

>
> On 1 Jun 2010, at 15:13, <michael.dillon at bt.com> <michael.dillon at bt.com> 
> wrote:
>
>>> don't.  What you do is that you enable router advertisements on both
>>> routers (and make sure they advertise the same prefixes).  If you
>>> want, you can fiddle with their priority along the way.
>>> 
>>> Then you simply leave the rest to Neighbor Unreachability Detection
>> 
>> It seems to me that all of the good bits from this discussion are
>> the kind of thing that belongs on an IPv6 cookbook site. ...
>
> I just have a sort of feeling that this sort of thing might have been done 
> before.  Perhaps some of these need updating?

I do have a sense of deja-vu in a lot of instances, and all this has been 
covered before:  you're correct.  I also agree that existing sites simply 
need updating or new ownership just to get them pushed along.  I'm 
currently facing that as I go throw my own IPv6 planning for another 
group.

>
> <
wfms



More information about the ipv6-ops mailing list