/127 between routers?

[Roger Jørgensen]

On tir, januar 5, 2010 15:38, Andrew Alston wrote:
> We use /127s all over the place on point to point links with no issues
> (We went this route after considering what was said in the latest link
> Janos posted below)
>
> Haven't really found any drawbacks with this yet

Some year back I stopped using /127 when Linux refused to route my
traffic. Had to add a static /128 for part of the /127 to get traffic
flowing again. Later I changed to /126 and the problem disapeared. Wonder
if I even had the same issue on some cisco routers to.

Should be mention that it was all IPv6 in IPv4 tunnels so could be related
to that to...



---


------------------------------
Roger Jorgensen      | - ROJO9-RIPE  - RJ85P-NORID
roger at jorgensen.no           | - The Future is IPv6
-------------------------------------------------------


A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?