/127 between routers?

[Kevin Loch]

Mohacsi Janos wrote:
> Also:
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-00.txt
> 

I use /112 for any link that doesn't have to be /64.
You can't beat the convenience of bit boundaries
on a ':".  It works great for p-p as well as
multi-router and server vlans.

A /112 is only 16,384 times less efficient than a
/126, but is still 281,474,976,710,656 times
more efficient than a /64 :)

- Kevin