XS4ALL Introduces native IPv6 for DSL customers

[Marco Hogewoning]

On 27 aug 2010, at 10:21, Gert Doering wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 09:49:24AM +0200, Daniel Roesen wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 09:16:09AM +0200, Marco Hogewoning wrote:
>>> Als a lot of folks out there once heard about the 48 and are still
>>> sticking to it, even when the policy differs. Saves ourself a lot
>>> of discussion and waving policy.
>> 
>> Unless you run out of /48s and have to go back to RIPE NCC to get more
>> address space. And then you're judged on /56s, not /48s for efficiency.
> 
> An /48 assigned counts as "all the /56s in there are assigned".
> 

That's the way I understood it as welland so far communications with IPRA indicate this is also the way it's handled. The bigger problem I have is how to handle sec 5.5 of RIPE-481. But I have a trusted source who tells this is being worked on.

Groet,

MarcoH