Sprint IPv6

Pierfrancesco Caci ik5pvx at gmail.com
Thu Oct 2 10:33:09 CEST 2008

On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote:
> Hi,
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 08:50:46AM +0200, Pierfrancesco Caci wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 08:53:25PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>> >> Then I switched to GBLX.
>> >
>> > ... so you got 6PE instead.  Dunno whether that's better.
>> Why would that matter?
> Well, it's "swap one tunnel technology to another tunnel technology",
> so the general question needs to be "why would that tunnel variant be
> any better?".

because you already have mpls on your net?

>> have you seen issues with providers/peers that use 6PE?
> Oh yes.  Especially with this one.

without entering in a "let's blame my provider" contest, can you tell
us what kind of problems did you see? I'm interested because we also
use 6PE and, besides that time I disabled mpls on a link trying to
solve a different problem, I have not received any feedback (positive
or negative) from my customers. Usually, that means things just work,
but you can never tell

 Pierfrancesco Caci, ik5pvx

More information about the ipv6-ops mailing list