current usage of AAAA implicit MX?

[Joseph T. Klein]

As a person who has a humble mail server at the end of an IPv6 tunnel, I 
get a small amount of traffic.
The sources are primarily mail list. These include any list relayed by 
mx2.freebsd.org, mout?.freenet.de, mail.lacnic.net, and mail.ietf.org.

I am using sendmail, cyrus imapd and thunderbird ... all the software in 
the path can and does handle IPv6 e-mail.

On occasions I come across broken DNS and arrogant network 
administrators who are unwilling to fix the brokenness.

The floodgates will open when gmail, yahoo, and hotmail decide to take 
the plunge.

Sander Steffann wrote:
> Hi,
>
>   
>> *	How big is the existing IPv6-enabled email world?
>>     
>
> The last few days I have seen incoming IPv6 SMTP from:
> - AT&T (2001:1890::/32)
> - Bit (2001:7b8::/32)
> - Bytemark (2001:41c8::/32)
> - Cambrium.nl (2a02:58::/32)
> - Surfnet (2001:610::/32)
> - Easynet (2001:6f8::/32)
> - Eweka (2001:4de0::/32)
> - Freenet.de (2001:748::/32)
> - ICP (2001:4020::/32)
> - Interway (2001:8e0::/32)
> - NBL (2001:1bc8::/32)
> - NTT (2001:218::/32)
> - Proserve (2001:828::/32)
> - Speedkom (2001:14e0::/32)
> - Xs4all (2001:888::/32)
>
> In traffic volume it's not much, but it seems to be growing.
> - Sander
>
>
>