IPv6 PI allocation

Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino 2.0 itojun at itojun.org
Thu May 31 06:55:55 CEST 2007


> Anyway, here is my questions in mind after reading the first mail for  
> PI allocation.
> 
> 1. Is there also a possibility of routing table explosion with IPv6  
> due to PI? And do we have to solve the problem with a technical aspect?
> 
> 2. The word 排outing registry" is dead? Is there no rule for 2 or  
> more prefixes from one AS? Or is there a demand for a good solution  
> for transit providers, in stead of "one prefix from one AS"?
> 
> 3. Do we need other sophisticated auto aggregation technology for PI  
> in routing protocols?
> 
> 4. Do we have to be against the size of /48 as PI?

	5. are you guys aware of potential growth of routing entries (2^16)
	   INSIDE your AS (/48)?  do you still think it easy enough to handle
	   IPv6 routing table size with your inexpensive routers?

itojun


More information about the ipv6-ops mailing list