Removal of e.f.f.3.ip6.arpa.

[David Conrad]

I would prefer to avoid lameness, even though nothing should every  
query this domain.

I'll accelerate removing the delegation now.

On Jun 27, 2006, at 10:14 AM, bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> do you mind if we remove the delegation from the serves (making  
> them lame)
> before you get around to it?
>
> --bill
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 09:36:37AM +0000, David Conrad wrote:
>> Yes.  The request was queued do remove the delegation, but we got a
>> bit busy with the ICANN meeting in Marrakech and I figured it didn't
>> hurt anything...
>>
>> Rgds,
>> -drc
>>
>> On Jun 27, 2006, at 8:47 AM, Alexander Gall wrote:
>>
>>> Now that 3ffe::/16 has been reclaimed by IANA, shouldn't the inverse
>>> delegation be removed as well?
>>>
>>> ; <<>> DiG 9.4.0a5 <<>> @dns1.icann.org e.f.f.3.ip6.arpa. ns +norec
>>> ; (1 server found)
>>> ;; global options:  printcmd
>>> ;; Got answer:
>>> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 408
>>> ;; flags: qr; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 4, ADDITIONAL: 0
>>>
>>> ;; QUESTION SECTION:
>>> ;e.f.f.3.ip6.arpa.              IN      NS
>>>
>>> ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
>>> e.f.f.3.ip6.arpa.       84600   IN      NS      sonata.hexago.com.
>>> e.f.f.3.ip6.arpa.       84600   IN      NS      ns3.nic.fr.
>>> e.f.f.3.ip6.arpa.       84600   IN      NS      flag.ep.net.
>>> e.f.f.3.ip6.arpa.       84600   IN      NS      imag.imag.fr.
>>>
>>> ;; Query time: 1320 msec
>>> ;; SERVER: 192.0.34.17#53(192.0.34.17)
>>> ;; WHEN: Tue Jun 27 10:41:54 2006
>>> ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 138
>>>
>>> Needless to say that half of these delegations are lame anyway.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Alex