Removal of e.f.f.3.ip6.arpa.
david.conrad at icann.org
Tue Jun 27 20:28:46 CEST 2006
I would prefer to avoid lameness, even though nothing should every
query this domain.
I'll accelerate removing the delegation now.
On Jun 27, 2006, at 10:14 AM, bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> do you mind if we remove the delegation from the serves (making
> them lame)
> before you get around to it?
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 09:36:37AM +0000, David Conrad wrote:
>> Yes. The request was queued do remove the delegation, but we got a
>> bit busy with the ICANN meeting in Marrakech and I figured it didn't
>> hurt anything...
>> On Jun 27, 2006, at 8:47 AM, Alexander Gall wrote:
>>> Now that 3ffe::/16 has been reclaimed by IANA, shouldn't the inverse
>>> delegation be removed as well?
>>> ; <<>> DiG 9.4.0a5 <<>> @dns1.icann.org e.f.f.3.ip6.arpa. ns +norec
>>> ; (1 server found)
>>> ;; global options: printcmd
>>> ;; Got answer:
>>> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 408
>>> ;; flags: qr; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 4, ADDITIONAL: 0
>>> ;; QUESTION SECTION:
>>> ;e.f.f.3.ip6.arpa. IN NS
>>> ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
>>> e.f.f.3.ip6.arpa. 84600 IN NS sonata.hexago.com.
>>> e.f.f.3.ip6.arpa. 84600 IN NS ns3.nic.fr.
>>> e.f.f.3.ip6.arpa. 84600 IN NS flag.ep.net.
>>> e.f.f.3.ip6.arpa. 84600 IN NS imag.imag.fr.
>>> ;; Query time: 1320 msec
>>> ;; SERVER: 188.8.131.52#53(184.108.40.206)
>>> ;; WHEN: Tue Jun 27 10:41:54 2006
>>> ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 138
>>> Needless to say that half of these delegations are lame anyway.
More information about the ipv6-ops