Removal of e.f.f.3.ip6.arpa.

[bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com]

do you mind if we remove the delegation from the serves (making them lame)
before you get around to it?

--bill


On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 09:36:37AM +0000, David Conrad wrote:
> Yes.  The request was queued do remove the delegation, but we got a  
> bit busy with the ICANN meeting in Marrakech and I figured it didn't  
> hurt anything...
> 
> Rgds,
> -drc
> 
> On Jun 27, 2006, at 8:47 AM, Alexander Gall wrote:
> 
> >Now that 3ffe::/16 has been reclaimed by IANA, shouldn't the inverse
> >delegation be removed as well?
> >
> >; <<>> DiG 9.4.0a5 <<>> @dns1.icann.org e.f.f.3.ip6.arpa. ns +norec
> >; (1 server found)
> >;; global options:  printcmd
> >;; Got answer:
> >;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 408
> >;; flags: qr; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 4, ADDITIONAL: 0
> >
> >;; QUESTION SECTION:
> >;e.f.f.3.ip6.arpa.              IN      NS
> >
> >;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
> >e.f.f.3.ip6.arpa.       84600   IN      NS      sonata.hexago.com.
> >e.f.f.3.ip6.arpa.       84600   IN      NS      ns3.nic.fr.
> >e.f.f.3.ip6.arpa.       84600   IN      NS      flag.ep.net.
> >e.f.f.3.ip6.arpa.       84600   IN      NS      imag.imag.fr.
> >
> >;; Query time: 1320 msec
> >;; SERVER: 192.0.34.17#53(192.0.34.17)
> >;; WHEN: Tue Jun 27 10:41:54 2006
> >;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 138
> >
> >Needless to say that half of these delegations are lame anyway.
> >
> >--
> >Alex