IANA IPv6 registry actions

[David Conrad]

Hi,

Yep.  Will get to it asap.  Hopefully it won't cause anyone any  
operational issues between now and when I can get the web pages  
updated... :-)

Rgds,
-drc

On Jun 12, 2006, at 1:39 PM, Geoff Huston wrote:

> Simple removal from http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv6-unicast- 
> address-assignments should be appropriate, as that registry lists  
> current allocated address ranges and this range is no longer  
> currently allocations. (also remove footnote 5 and renumber foot  
> notes 6, and 7)
>
> As per http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv6-address-space, the  
> block then reverts to the status "Reserved by the IETF"
>
>
> regards,
>
>     Geoff
>
> At 05:45 AM 13/06/2006, Kevin Loch wrote:
>> > We'll be removing the ip6 delegation from .INT today.
>>
>> Would it be possible to update:
>>
>> http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv6-unicast-address-assignments
>>
>> to indicate the current status of 3ffe::/16?
>>
>> I'm not sure if simply marking it as "RESERVED" or deleting
>> it from the enumerated list completely would give the clearest
>> indication of it's current status (if it is in fact reserved
>> as I haven't seen anything from IANA indicating this yet).
>>
>> The footnote [5] should also be updated to reflect current
>> status.  If the 3ffe::/16 line is deleted then the footnote could
>> be moved to the first line as in:
>>
>> "IPV6 GLOBAL UNICAST ADDRESS ASSIGNMENTS [0] [5]"
>>
>> - Kevin
>