6bone/ip6.int interaction
Hank Nussbacher
hank at efes.iucc.ac.il
Mon Jun 12 20:23:36 CEST 2006
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
Thank you David! If it was up to Bill we would all still be using EGP ala
RFC904 since there might be 1 or 2 machines out there that haven't yet
managed to migrate. :-)
-Hank
> well, i've been waiting for the swedes to re-name some nodes
> in that zone, so, yes, i'll be a bit peaved, but its your call.
>
> --bill
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 10:00:12AM -0700, David Conrad wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We'll be removing the ip6 delegation from .INT today.
> >
> > Please let me know if this will cause anyone any heartache (well,
> > anyone but Bill :-))
> >
> > Rgds,
> > -drc
> >
> > On Jun 12, 2006, at 7:32 AM, bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> >
> > >On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 04:06:24PM +0200, Michael Horn wrote:
> > >>Bill, list,
> > >>
> > >>On Mon, 12 Jun 2006, bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 03:28:00PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>3FFE is IANA reserved.
> > >>>
> > >>>hum... then if the IANA wants that delegation removed, they
> > >>>should ask...
> > >>
> > >>who should they ask? you? don't you overestimate the importance of
> > >>your
> > >>person to iana, bill? seriously... if iana would care about any
> > >>bogons out
> > >>there they had much to do.
> > >>
> > >>The thing that should keep you away from announcing prefixes from
> > >>unallocated space would be common sense and politeness which you
> > >>obviously seem to lack in this case. sorry for you.
> > >>but running a service a minor number of people rely on and being this
> > >>ignorant is rather rude imho. what do you think you gain with your
> > >>actions?
> > >>
> > >>Kind Regards,
> > >>no offense intended, just wondering about your motivation,
> > >>
> > >>Michael Horn
> > >
> > > they should ask, just like the other folks w/ delegations in that
> > > space, to add/delete/change entries in the zone. random, self-
> > >appointed
> > > net-police are fine, just don't expect too much to happen if the
> > >actual
> > > delegates don't specify their wishes.
> > >
> > > DNS entries and route annoucements are distinctly different things.
> > >
> > >--bill
>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> This Mail Was Scanned By Mail-seCure System
> at the Tel-Aviv University CC.
>
More information about the ipv6-ops
mailing list