6bone/ip6.int interaction

[bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com]

 well, i've been waiting for the swedes to re-name some nodes
 in that zone, so, yes, i'll be a bit peaved, but its your call.
 
--bill


On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 10:00:12AM -0700, David Conrad wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> We'll be removing the ip6 delegation from .INT today.
> 
> Please let me know if this will cause anyone any heartache (well,  
> anyone but Bill :-))
> 
> Rgds,
> -drc
> 
> On Jun 12, 2006, at 7:32 AM, bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> 
> >On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 04:06:24PM +0200, Michael Horn wrote:
> >>Bill, list,
> >>
> >>On Mon, 12 Jun 2006, bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 03:28:00PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>3FFE is IANA reserved.
> >>>
> >>>hum... then if the IANA wants that delegation removed, they  
> >>>should ask...
> >>
> >>who should they ask? you? don't you overestimate the importance of  
> >>your
> >>person to iana, bill? seriously... if iana would care about any  
> >>bogons out
> >>there they had much to do.
> >>
> >>The thing that should keep you away from announcing prefixes from
> >>unallocated space would be common sense and politeness which you
> >>obviously seem to lack in this case. sorry for you.
> >>but running a service a minor number of people rely on and being this
> >>ignorant is rather rude imho. what do you think you gain with your
> >>actions?
> >>
> >>Kind Regards,
> >>no offense intended, just wondering about your motivation,
> >>
> >>Michael Horn
> >
> >	they should ask, just like the other folks w/ delegations in that
> >	space, to add/delete/change entries in the zone.  random, self- 
> >appointed
> >	net-police are fine, just don't expect too much to happen if the  
> >actual
> >	delegates don't specify their wishes.
> >
> >	DNS entries and route annoucements are distinctly different things.
> >
> >--bill