N reasons for not deploying ipv6 (was: Re: [narten@us.ibm.com:PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN])

[Peter Salanki]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I'm doing IPv6 on 7600 and 12000, if that counts as high end.. Never  
tried it on the CRS though.
17 apr 2006 kl. 20.53 skrev Pierfrancesco Caci:

> On 4/17/06, Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch at muada.com> wrote:
>> I think that's a fairy tale too. What kind of gear that you can buy
>> today can't do IPv6? And how much of that is un-upgradable? Basically
>> only stuff that has hardware support for IPv4 processing built in,
>> such as multilayer switches, some routers and some things like load
>> balancers. If you simply only buy new gear that either supports IPv6
>
> Have you tried to do ipv6 on high end cisco?
>
> --
>  Pierfrancesco Caci | ik5pvx | mailto: ik5pvx at gmail.com  -  http:// 
> www.caci.it
>      Firenze - Italia     | Office for the Complication of Otherwise
> Simple Affairs

- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFEQ+vNiQKhdiFGiogRAlvaAJ4nLG5oH3zHRRhOZbYRcLFMU3siqgCghoWF
SkE3JkMRhRaxb5dwCcuMoiM=
=uxEi
- -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFEQ+wNiQKhdiFGiogRApvdAJ46BFIJ6hDg0SuNZ6sRnNU5pYKioQCeMZ8W
sBiGgryhK8a/7MS9+YyD89E=
=9wou
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----