<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><br></div><div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>Thanks for the quick reply.</div><div><br></div><div><div>On 11 Feb 2012, at 15:09, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Hello Arturo,<br>
<br>
good catch! The analysis on small samples is odd and I am still
trying to work out the bug/inaccuracy. It's a complex mix of GeoIP
on IPv4 addresses brought about by gTLDs -- so the sample domain
size for .GT is 71 domains, only a 31 of them are actually hosted in
Guatemala.<br>
The analysis returns 2 hosts only which have an IPv6 compatible NS
but yes, this should be displayed as 2 / 31, so not 100% -- although
those name-servers are not even in the country itself.<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>Yes, 100% was too much. Now it looks more realistic.</div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
I am currently working with the team to produce more meaningful
results on small samples. The issue of name-server location being
sticky since many domains use secondary DNS that's IPv6 compatible
but don't really make the domain IPv6 compatible as such.<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>It depends. If the criteria is to resolve a domain name using ipv6 only it does not matter, however if the criteria is to resolve a domain using ipv6 using a dns in that country, then you are right.</div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
The data's stored. I expect we'll get more accurate results once we
refine the analysis.<br>
Kind regards,<br>
<br>
Olivier<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>as</div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
On 11/02/2012 14:21, Arturo Servin wrote :
<blockquote cite="mid:AEE6EC55-4D73-46D0-8635-BDCB007FD5FA@lacnic.net" type="cite">
<div>Oliver,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>there
is some odd data, for example, only two hosts in Guatemala?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span></div>
<div>Regards,</div>
<div>as</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div>On 8 Feb 2012, at 09:12, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote:</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<blockquote type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> (apologies for
cross-posting)<br>
<br>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
Dear all,<br>
<br>
please find below my latest presentations for the IPv6
Matrix project. The latest one is the one I was going to
give at Pondicherry, India, showing very modest growth of
IPv6 (but I ran out of time). As of 1 Feb 2012, we now have
120Gb of historical data about the worldwide spread of IPv6,
in text form, sampled regularly since summer 2010. <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.ipv6matrix.org/">http://www.ipv6matrix.org/</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://www.slideshare.net/ocl999/ipv6-matrix-exec-summary-dec-2011-icca-pondicherry-31-jan-2012" title="IPv6 Matrix Exec Summary Dec 2011 - ICCA
Pondicherry 31 Jan 2012">IPv6 Matrix Exec Summary Dec 2011
Results - ICCA Pondicherry 31 Jan 2012 </a><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.slideshare.net/ocl999/ipv6-matrix-exec-summary-dec-2011-icca-pondicherry-31-jan-2012">http://www.slideshare.net/ocl999/ipv6-matrix-exec-summary-dec-2011-icca-pondicherry-31-jan-2012</a><br>
<br>
<br>
Reminder of my previous presentation, right after the June
2011 IPv6 day:<br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://www.slideshare.net/ocl999/ipv6-matrix-exec-summary-july-2011" title="IPv6 Matrix Exec Summary July 2011 Results">IPv6
Matrix Exec Summary July 2011 Results </a><span class="meta"><span class="metaGroup"><span class="stats"><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.slideshare.net/ocl999/ipv6-matrix-exec-summary-july-2011">http://www.slideshare.net/ocl999/ipv6-matrix-exec-summary-july-2011</a></span></span></span><br>
<br>
As a reminder, this project was launched thanks to an ISOC
Community Grant and remains supported by TwentyTwenty Media
Ltd for its ongoing IPv6 Internet connectivity.<br>
<br>
We plan to soon engage in another round of funding in order
to perform trend analysis of our results database.<br>
<br>
Warm regards,<br>
<br>
Olivier<br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.gih.com/ocl.html">http://www.gih.com/ocl.html</a>
</pre>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.gih.com/ocl.html">http://www.gih.com/ocl.html</a>
</pre>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br></body></html>