Fwd: SLAAC renum: Problem Statement & Operational workarounds

[Fernando Gont]

Folks,

Your input would be very welcome. Preferably on the v6ops wg
mailing-list (https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops), but also on
this list or multicast to us (authors).

Thanks!


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: SLAAC renum: Problem Statement & Operational workarounds
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 03:51:32 -0500
From: Fernando Gont <fgont at si6networks.com>
To: IPv6 Operations <v6ops at ietf.org>

Folks,

Earlier this year there was a lot of discussion about slaac renumbering
problems. Our original I-D covered everything from the problem statement
to proposed protocol updates and operational workarounds.

Based on the comments received while discussing this topic on this list
and other forums, and in order to keep the discussion better focused on
specific aspects of the problem, we have posted a v6ops-targetted
document that focuses on:

* The problem statement
* Discussion of operational workarounds, and associated constraints

The document is available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gont-v6ops-slaac-renum

We'd like to hear from the wg whether we have missed anything, whether
the document is useful to the community, etc.

Thanks!

Cheers,
-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont at si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492