question regarding over the counter devices
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Mon Mar 6 14:32:23 CET 2017
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 02:07:31PM +0100, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Mar 2017, Gert Doering wrote:
>
> > 3G mandated IPv6, no carrier actually deployed it *before* they had a
> > huge legacy of IPv4-only handsets in the field... could have been done
> > from day one.
>
> On the other hand no handset manufacturer apart from Nokia ever made any
> 3G handsets that supported IPv6.
I'm not sure why "point to the part in the 3G specs that says v6 is mandatory"
would have been so hard...
> Also, since you needed two concurrent bearers and the 3GPP network vendors
> charged per bearer, it also make IPv6 deployment extremely expensive.
>
> Yes, plenty of blame to go around. It's not only a carrier problem.
If you wanted reasons to not deploy IPv6, there have always been excuses
galore.
But then do not complain 10 years later that you have such a large basis
of IPv4-only clients and all of a sudden it's sooo much work...
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20170306/7dd87f65/attachment.sig>
More information about the ipv6-ops
mailing list