Fwd: [Bp_ixps] IXPs & IPv6
Michael Oghia
mike.oghia at gmail.com
Thu Oct 20 17:33:38 CEST 2016
Yes! Sorry about that Nick. Rob already clarified.
-Michael
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org> wrote:
> Michael Oghia wrote:
> > Thanks Nick. Sad to hear, but hopefully we can change that.
>
> you're misunderstanding completely! It means that ipv6 is considered to
> be of the same importance as ipv4 in the ixp world from the point of
> view of passing production traffic over the ixp fabric. As far as the
> IXP world is concerned, this is an excellent situation to be in.
>
> Nick
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20161020/18e663c0/attachment.htm>
More information about the ipv6-ops
mailing list